Poverty Is Not A Lack Of Character - 1457 Words

â€Å"Poverty is not a lack of character. It is a lack of money, a lack of opportunity, a lack of investment. It’s when society turns its back and make you invisible.† ~Yozgat Poverty is defined by the Webster Dictionary as, â€Å"The state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions.† The United States of America measures poverty by a poverty line; if you live under the line you are considered to live in poverty and if you live above the poverty line you are not considered to live in poverty. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the line of poverty for a household of one is $11, 770 and you add $4,160 for every additional person. ‘Individuals, families and groups in the population can be said to be in poverty when they lack resources to obtain the type of diet, participate in the activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or at least widely encouraged and approved, in the societies in which they belong.’ — Peter Townsend Social Service Delivery System When it comes to poverty, there are many social services provided for the people. The question is, are they all making a positive impact on the people. One of the social services provided is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). SNAP is a program formerly known as â€Å"food stamps†. It is a federal nutrition program that helps you stretch your food budget and buy heathy food. â€Å"It has achieved broad-based politicalShow MoreRelatedPoverty : The Gulf Coast810 Words   |  4 PagesPoverty can change how people act and the way that they live in society. Poverty can also stand for the experience someone may lose by living the same way as everyone else around them. Poverty can mean different things such as lack money and experience, but all types of poverty can limit what a person can do such as in the short stories â€Å"The Gulf Coast,† â€Å"The Louisiana Live Oak Society,† and â€Å"The Man Who Was Almost a Man .† The short story â€Å"The Gulf Coast† shows poverty by the lack of experienceRead MoreLoneliness Is The Ultimate Poverty1147 Words   |  5 Pagesthe ultimate poverty. Steinbeck’s novel Of Mice and Men agrees with her statement, the book clearly projects the message of the awfulness of loneliness. Crooks says â€Å"I tell ya a guy gets too lonely an’ he gets sick†(73) Throughout the story Of Mice and Men, Steinbeck utilizes the theme loneliness. The story takes place in the town of Soledad which means solitude in Spanish, which foreshadows the problem of loneliness in the story. Loneliness is clearly evident in many of the characters in the bookRead MoreSocial Poverty In Daniel Girard, By Daniel Cojocaru981 Words   |  4 Pagesto be punished(‘Rene Girard’). It could be argued that this lack of innocence realtes to the ‘social distinction’ as discussed by Cojocaru. In this way, the scapegoat can be seen as a form of ‘case poverty’ and not indivitive of the larger community, in the eyes of those whom are suffering from ‘insular poverty’. Nevertheless, it seems that the community at large believes the ‘case impoverished’ are responsible for their overall poverty. Also, it is important to note, that scapegoating can beRead MoreA Child s Education Is Vital991 Words   |  4 PagesWhat is poverty and does social class shape the character of a child’s life and education, especially those children of poverty? These questions are important to consider for educators and all involved in the goal for children to have greater achievement. It s even more important to note that forty percent of the poor, in the United States, are children (Stevenson, 1997). Knowing this is the reason that finding solutions and studying the effects of parent involvement, both at school and at homeRead MoreAnalysis Of As I Lay Dying 1682 Words   |  7 PagesProfession of Poverty As Robert Kennedy once said, â€Å"I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil† (Kennedy). Money and wealth contribute to the image a person presents. In a world based on standards such as those, the wealthy will seem to be superior to the poor and that almost never ends in a positive way. William Faulkner, author of As I Lay Dying, was aware of the effects of poverty and took the opportunity to use his characters to depict poverty s effects. The novel takes placeRead MoreA Raisin Of The Sun By Lorraine Hansberry1581 Words   |  7 Pagesactivist, spent almost all of her life dealing with American racism, poverty, and lack of social mobility. As a person who witnessed the daily struggles of African Americans, Hansberry wanted to expose the hypocrisy in the idea that America was the land of equal opportunity. As a result, in 1959, Hansberry wrote the play, A Raisin in the Sun, which details the Youngers, an African American family, who experienced racism, pove rty, and the lack of social mobility during the 1950s in Chicago’s Southside. ThroughoutRead MoreEssay on Poverty in Edith Whartons Ethan Frome648 Words   |  3 PagesPoverty in Edith Whartons Ethan Frome Poverty is defined as deficiency, or inadequacy. It can be used to represent more than just the lack of money. Poverty is constant throughout the novel, Ethan Frome, by Edith Wharton. Poverty is evident in almost every area of Ethans life. First of all, obviously, Ethan lacked money. His farm squeezed out just enough money to keep him and his household going. On page 133, Ethan is thinking of selling his property, but then he remembers its conditionRead MoreThe Film Crash By Paul Haggis992 Words   |  4 PagesThere are many social issues that plague our society and many of these problems are closely related to social class and race. Some of these issues include prejudice, individual discrimination, institutional discrimination, relative poverty, absolute poverty, and social class. Much of this is touched upon in Paul Haggis’ 2004 film Crash that even over a decade after its release the social issues brought up in the film still apply. The film Crash depicts many scenes of discrimination that all applyRead MoreNative Americans in Poverty a Losing Battle: The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie769 Words   |  4 Pagesauthor of The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian made this very clear through plot, characters and the themes. Certain points in the novel stuck out which clearly represented how hard it is for Native Americans to escape poverty. Native Americans often believe that they have no control over being in poverty so they do not try to get themselves out of it. When Native Americans try to overcome poverty, they are often unsupported by tribe members and considered outcasts. Finally money on theRead MorePoverty In A Raisin In The Sun1413 Words   |  6 PagesEconomic and societal poverty are the key forms of poverty highlighted in the three-act play, A Raisin in the Sun. Lorraine Hansberry, the playwright, discusses the hardships of African-Americans attempting to eme rge in society in the 1950’s. The play is staged in ways where the audience can grasp the trifles of an African-American family continuously experiencing setbacks whilst attempting to achieve their notion of the â€Å"American Dream†. To Walter Lee Younger, his idea of the â€Å"American Dream†

Eveline Essay examples - 721 Words

Harsha Perera Professor Hogan English Comp 201 014 October 2, 2012 Comparison of Eveline and Connie â€Å"Eveline† and â€Å"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been† are similar stories set in different eras. â€Å"Eveline† is a short story written by James Joyce. â€Å"Where are you going, Where have you been† is a short story written by Joyce Carol Oates. Eveline and Connie are two teenage girls who are ultimately trapped by the influences of their cultures. The church plays a heavy influence on Eveline throughout the story. Eveline is conflicted on whether she should leave with Frank or stay behind with her father. The unknown priest mentioned in the story appears to be significant because of his absence. The priest represents the†¦show more content†¦Connie on the other hand is affected by the pop culture of her time. The pop culture works as Connie’s connection from the real world to her fantasy world. â€Å"Connie sat with her eyes closed in the sun, dreaming and dazed with the wa rmth about her as if this were a kind of love, the caresses of love, and her mind slipped over onto thoughts of the boy she had been with the night before and how nice he had been, how sweet it always was, not the way someone like June would suppose but sweet, gentle, the way it was in movies and promised in songs;†(Oates 211). Connie enjoys escaping her life by listening to music and daydreaming about boys. She gets her fantasies about romance mostly from songs on the radio. The happiness she finds with boys is mostly fixed on these romantic fantasies and not the boys themselves. When Arnold shows up at her house, she finds herself entranced by him. â€Å"â€Å"Bobby King?† she said. â€Å"I listen to him all the time. I think he’s great.†Ã¢â‚¬ (Oates 212). Since she notices that Arnold is playing the same music she listens to she lowers her guard a little. She lowers her guard because the music he is listening to makes her think that he is around her a ge. Eveline and Connie are both subjugated and misguided by the culture of their times. Eveline is obligated to do her duties as expected from the church and subdued by a patriarchalShow MoreRelated Empty Spaces in James Joyces Eveline from Dubliners Essay1080 Words   |  5 Pagesclearly delineating his characters every feature, Joyce concentrates on hinting at the emotional meanings of his depictions with a rich thick dab of paint here and there. Although Joyce flexes his descriptive muscles in the Dubliners short story Eveline (1914,) he leaves much to the imagination of the reader through calculated omissions and suggestive phrases.    Such omissions begin at the opening of the story; She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue (Joyce 37). JoyceRead MoreEveline s Struggles By Eveline944 Words   |  4 PagesStruggles Although Eveline has to be the central life and the caretaker of her family’s home, she dwells on the past and fearing her life ahead of her. Eveline is seen as the woman in charge of the household. The narrator states, â€Å"Of course she had to work hard, both in the house and at business,† implying that she not only works hard around the home but also has a job where she earns her own money (Joyce). Eveline takes care of the home and has to keep it clean and together. Also, Eveline had been â€Å"treatedRead MoreEveline1643 Words   |  7 PagesIn â€Å"Eveline,† James Joyce uses the juxtaposition of the ever-changing setting and the unchanging stoic character of Eveline in order to exemplify the character’s reluctance and inability to move forward. James Joyce is known for his juxtaposition of light and dark throughout his short stories, specifically in his story â€Å"Araby.† I would argue that Joyce is using the contrast of opposing forces described above between the setting and the character in a similar way as he was light and dark. â€Å"Araby†Read MoreEveline3513 Words   |  15 Pageselsewhere. The Irish were second-class citizens within their own nation; Ireland was a British colony and the Northern Protestants controlled the economy of the country. Catholic families often faced hardship. Alcoholism and abuse, as portrayed in â€Å"Eveline† were rampant. As a result, many of the Irish sought to escape James Joyce represents everyday life of Dublin in the early twentieth century in his collection of short stories, Dubliners. Dubliners consists of 15 stories and each of them unfoldsRead MoreReflection Of Eveline1135 Words   |  5 PagesEveline In the short story â€Å"Eveline† by James Joyce, talks about a young woman who is around nineteen years of age that deals with a lot in life. As Eveline sits and gazes out the window one evening, she begins to think about her past and how it has been painful to her.   Growing up Eveline didn’t have the best family life. She had an abusive father who would always terrorize the family.   Before Eveline’s mother died, she told Eveline to make sure she watched after her brothers and to keep them safeRead MoreEveline Essay578 Words   |  3 Pagesthe short story Eveline by James Joyce, the title character Eveline is fearful of making a change in her life by moving with her boyfriend Frank from her homeland of Ireland and making a life with him in Buenos Ayres. Joyce illustrates that one of our most inherent qualities as humans and one that Eveline displays is that we are resistant to change. Through Evelines relationships with her father, Frank and various peripheral relationships, Joyce demonstrates to us how Eveline has come to haveRead MoreAnalysis Of The Novel Eveline 1069 Words   |  5 PagesIn Joyce’s, â€Å"Eveline†, most of the story is situated in the mind of the main character, Eveline. Eveline is characterized as passive, easily-influenced, and indecisive. Joyce highlights Eveline’s indecisiveness as she struggles with her immediate predicament; should she leave her abusive father and disobey her duty as a daughter, or pursue a new life with her potential husband Frank, to be free? As she contemplates, readers are taken inside Eveline’s mind to discover factors from her pas t and presentRead MoreChildhood Abuse In Eveline1128 Words   |  5 Pages James Joyces short story Eveline is set in Dublin, Ireland during the turn of the 20th century. The suffering was of the Irish was immense during this time in history, due to the struggle of against the English occupation of Ireland. An observation made about Dublin during the early 1900s was that â€Å"the Irish capital is paralysed by Catholicism, by the English imperialism, by grave poverty and social injustice† (Boyson). Ireland was still reeling from the famine the occurred fifty yearsRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Eveline1123 Words   |  5 PagesJames Joyce’s Eveline is a story of a woman dealing with the decision to stay at home with her father and the children she cares for while enduring abuse, or going out across the sea with her boyfriend Frank, who wishes to make Eveline his wife. Although Eveline s father had caused her strife through his abusiveness, she reflects on a tim e when she was younger and her mother was still alive and he was not that way. Eveline wonders what what they would say about her in the stores if she were to goRead MoreSummary Of The Story Eveline Essay718 Words   |  3 Pagesto interpret the short story Eveline; however, I feel this story is very meaningful. In the story, the 19 year old Eveline lives at home with her father and works at home and in their store in a small town in Dublin, Ireland. Her brother Ernest has passed and Harry was in the church decorating business and would help the family out by sending money. Eveline worked and would give all of the money she earned to her father. When her father did give her money, Eveline was expected to use that money

Maxims Were Originally Quoted Down In Latin-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Maxims Were Originally Quoted Down In Latin? Answer: Introduction Doctrine of unclean hands is a Maxims. Maxims were originally quoted down in Latin. They are not any written down law, they are general rules that have been enforced by the law as a general rule and has continued to run down through generations amongst judges. [1]The exact words of the maxim may vary from court to court but the real meaning will always remain the same. Maxim of equity are general rules that are governs in the way the court of equity operates. They explain the nature of the remedies in relation to the common law as a more easy way to fulfil the needs of the people to decide the parties conduct and how worthy are they. As mentioned in the doctrine of unclean hands it says that one who comes to equity must come with clean hands. [2]The purpose of the doctrine is to protect the integrity of the court. It says that the court will not help those who have done wrong themselves. Any one who seeks justice in court of law should be free from illegal or unethical conduct. [3]If the problem for which the person seeks aid from the court has created the problem by their own, in that case the court will not help. The courts will not a help anyone who itself is guilty of any improper conduct. The integrity of the court is protected through this maxim. The court will not aid anyone who has done something illegal or has started the problem that he or she has started. This illegal or bad conduct may be direct or indirect in nature, in both the cases the person will be considered liable. For example: Mr. A hired Mr. B as his agent to sell his products that he manufactures. Now during the time of selling Mr. B promised his customers something which is not real in nature. [4]Mr A was aware about the situation, still keeps silent. After a while some dispute arose on that particular sale with that particular customer. In this situation though Mr A himself kept silent about the situation and is directly not liable but he was aware about the situation and the agent was hired by him so in that case he himself was liable and faulty and will not get any aid from the court as he himself is not clean. The court will not grant relief [5]in case where both the parties have tried to dodge the law or have done anything which is illegal in nature or is considered to be a bad act. Under the doctrine of unclean hands the defendant may question that the plaintiff is not in liberty to get a[6] relief as they have them themselves done something wrong in relation to the case in particular that the plaintiff has filed for and he should not be entitled to get any kind of remedy or aid in relation to that particular case. But there should be ample proof that the plaintiff has done some misconduct in relation to that particular case and its intention is not proper. This type of doctrine is only[7] available in relief which is only in form of equity. The doctrine of unclean hands are not available in cases resulting in legal damages that is to be exact it is not available in the cases which is in relation to monetary awards. In case of such a doctrine it is kind of a positive defence in nature. In the case of doctrine of unclean hands relies fully on the defendant. This means that the defendant has to put up the allegation upon the plaintiff and it is upon the defendant to come up with the proof and evidence that can prove such an allegation. So we can say that the doctrine of unclean hand totally depends on the discretion of the defendant. In such a doctrine the allegations at first has to be put forward by the defendant Accounting also has to be proved by the defendant. There are some specific contracts where[8] the doctrine of unclean hands can be put up by the defendant. It can be performed in case of equitable form of relief. The types of contract claims where the doctrine of unclean hands can be put up: Specific performance This is a type of contract which is specific in nature where both the parties have gone into contract [9]have mentioned all the details about how carry out the contract. This type contract may include delivering of a consignment. Contract rescission In this type of contract it cancels the old[10] contract and forms a new one. In this type of contract the doctrine of unclean hands may prevail. Contract reformation If the contract is redefined or rewritten to make changes in order to rectify the previous mistakes, in that case the doctrine of [11]unclean hands may prevail. In case of a contract mentioned if the plaintiff request the court of law to provide relief under the above mentioned reforms in that case the defendant may claim for doctrine of unclean hands. The doctrine of unclean hands is available for bother the defendant and the plaintiff in case of contract. [12]As the plaintiff may claim that the defendant has performed something wrong and is not entitle to get an aid from the court of law. To prove the requirement of [13]unclean hands may vary from cases it is not required that both the plaintiff and the defendant has performed same kind of misconduct. It may so happen that the plaintiff has performed misconduct and the defendant was silent that time consciously knowing due to some personal interest, in that case the defendant is equally liable for the misconduct. Knowingly staying silent due to some personal interest is assumed that the person is also performed the same misconduct and such a situation both of them the defendant and the plaintiff will not get any aid from the court of law. The doctrine of unclean hands has nothing to do with the general moral character of the person. [14]If the persons moral character is not good, that wont be enough to prove that the person is performed and misconduct and doctrine of unclean hands can be levied upon him. In some case where the plaintiff has committed a bad conduct in that case the defendant may claim doctrine of[15] unclean hands. The doctrine of unclean hands may prevail under some situation the person that is it may be the defendant or the plaintiff has failed to honour the contract agreement. In that case the doctrine may prevail. If the plaintiff has acted dishonestly or has fraudulently this against the nature of the contract, in that case the doctrine of unclean hands may prevail. If the plaintiff has performed a crime that is in relation with the contract, in that case the doctrine of unclean hands will prevail. If the plaintiff has forced the person to go into contract with him and late comes to [16]court for aid against that person for that same contract, in that case the defendant may claim for doctrine of unclean hands. In case the contract that the plaintiff has gone into has been achieved with violence or committing any fraud, in that case the doctrine of unclean hands c ould be claimed from the side of the defendant. Taking example of a Famous case: John Everet Vs Joseph Williams In the case that John Evert vs. Joseph Williams, were both highway robbers, who entered into a partnership where they robbed highway travellers and split the loot of their robberies. After the looted things were sold and divided, [17]Evert thought that he did not get the fair share of the looted amount and took Williams to the court. As the court came to know about the act of both the parties that the disputed amount that they were talking about was actually an amount of loot. The court dismissed the case and issued warrant against both the parties declaring them guilty. As the case tells us that in this situation where both the parties are guilty of starting the problem that they want to resolve in court, they will not get any aid from the side of the court. [18]So in order to get any aid or resolution one needs to be free from any wrongful act. This means that those who seek justice should do justice. As when a defendant appeals for the doctrine of clean hands to cancel the charges that have been brought upon him then the [19]court will see if the plaintiff has performed any misconduct or not and if he has then it needs to be found whether the misconduct is in relation to controversy for which the plaintiff has appealed for. The court will see if the Plaintiff is engaged in a fraudulent or illegal misconduct more or less in relation to the case or he has performed any misconduct at the end and ants that[20] status quo should be resolved back to the previous situation. If the desired relief and harm the interest of other in that case it can be denied by the court. The doctrine says that justice is not served by doing any harm to the third party. So if ever there is a situation[21] that by any decision if taken by the court can harm someone in that case the decision will not stand in the court of law. The difficult problem in the court of law is that when a contract between parties become unenforceable due because of the relation of the particular contract to the crime, in that case the decision is very satisfactory as court will not aid a trade which may cause fraud to the public. [22]The doctrine says that if a company that seeks legal aid for any trade misconduct that it has faced and the company itself has committed any crime against the public or third party in that case the court will not be able to provide any aid to the parties who are seeking for the aid. An extensive rule that may effect is to some point will restrict people from illegal work. But this will happen when such prevention is demanded by the public for their welfare, in that case as according to the above mentioned example where one person demands the looted amount. [23]The plaintiff in that case was denied of any legal aid due to the illegal act that he has performed in the past that has a relation to the subject matter of the particular case. So it tells that in a situation such as this where the court will not be able to perform full justice, in that case should restrain from doing any justice at all. The court has further mentioned that the party to the contract which is illegally executed may withdraw from such contract for the benefits conferred. [24]To this rule there is an exception in case of the law in relation to the quasi contract which in effect understands the ultimate policy in relation, to possible prevention to a crime which is very serious in nature. Wachter v Carlson 2012 BCSC 1390is a good example of doctrine of unclean hands This case involves an aged couple who moved in a house with a boy and his family In this case that was filed by the parents of the defendant[25] who was the female and the wife. They entered in a deal where they mentioned that the defendant who was the husband will arrange a mortgage to finance a house where they will live together. The house that is mentioned over here is to be bought in Okanagan with the mortgage of the defendant who is the husband in this case. In this case the plaintiff and defendant both lived together in the same house which was financed by the defendant. The mortgage was produced by the defendant. As the defendant arranged the mortgage of for buying the house both the parties came into a contract where they had a mutual agreement that the mortgage will be provided by the defendant and rest all expenses will be beard by the plaintiff.[26] It so happened where the defendant arranged the mortgage and the plaintiff did the bid for the house. From buying the house, paying taxes, maintenance etc all were maintained by the plaintiff. The defendan t did not pay any expenses regarding the house. As the mortgage was in the name of the defendant so the house was in the name of the defendant, whereas they went into a contract mentioning a lease management between them for a period of 60 months or we can say 5 years. Apart form this lease agreement the plaintiff had no documents in support to the house. Apart from this the plaintiff carried out all the expenses in relation to the house. The rent agreement that they went into was of the same amount of that of the amount of the mortgage that is paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, moreover the plaintiff also paid the insurance and tax of the house. So by this we can understand that the defendant did not pay any amount in regard to the house and also the rent amount within these five years matches the amount of the mortgage so in real no amount for the property was paid by the defendant. After the completion of the five years or 60 months agreement the relation between them broke and as the ownership of the house belong in the name of the defendant so there was no document that can support the ownership of the house. The plaintiff filed a case in the court stating that the house in real sense belongs to them as they have paid all the expenses in relation to the house. [27]On the other hand the defendant claims that the intention of the plaintiff was wrong and their hands were not clean as according to the doctrine of unclean hands The court thought otherwise, it came to a conclusion that the plaintiff made all the expenses in relation to the house from insurance, maintenance, building etc. every cost except the mortgage which was also paid as a rent in those five years. The court found that the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant was not exact landlord tenant relationship. [28]They both have equal interest upon the house and the ownership was named after the defendant in order to acquire more mortgage amount as they were not wealthy enough. So in this case the defendant could not prove that there was any wrong intention on the part of the plaintiff and[29] that the doctrine of unclean hands should prevail. So in that case the court mentioned that the plaintiff is the rightful owner of the house. With the introduction of Judicature Act 1873 a new era in the court of justice prevailed. Before the introduction of judicature act there were cases where common law and equity had different rules that gave rise to issues and confusion in the mind of the people and the remedies that were being given were also had inconsistency.[30] In that case the rule of equity will succeed with award of common order. Before the act Judicature, the common law and law of equity had rules which were different from each other and that might give rise to conflicting remedies. In cases like that the rule of equity succeeds by granting common order. Prior to the Act of Judicature there used to be different rules that existed for the same subject in matter to the different court of law.[31] The cases that are of same nature that came up on different court of law were treated differently as there was no exact rule that was mentioned for a particular case. The judges of different court saw those cases from view point and different angles and came up with different remedies which did not used to match with each other. So this problem existed and there were lawyers who used change the subject of the case and presented the case in such a way which use to make the judges deal the cases indifferently. There was problem that existed which came to an end after the introduction of Judicature Act in the year 1873. After enactment of this act there was a set of fixed rules that was mentioned so that it prevails on every court of law so that there was no confusion in dealing the cases and the remedies are common in nature. This act helped to eliminate the confusion and problem discrimination that people were not very happy about. There were situation in some cases where it used to happen that common law and law of equity came in to collision. In some cases the legal rule conflicting with the law of equity was a great problem that was a common in days the enactment of the Judicature Act and at that moment it was practiced that in such occasion the law of equity will succeed the legal aid. With the introduction of judicature Act there was no such space left for confusion of any kind as there was only one law that existed. This was a great revolutionary act which dismissed all confusion in existence and made it very easy for the court to work. There were times when the remedy that was sometime was available done not used to match for common law or rules of equity. So there was confusion that used caused a problem. For example for break of contract there was no remedy under the rules of equity whereas on the other hand the common law would offer damages for such an act. So we can see how both the laws used to be in contradicting to each other. Where common law offers damages for breach of contract on the other hand the law of equity does not have and such remedy. So there was a confusion that prevail all the time and there was no fixed remedy and this confusion so big great that there was a huge problem as people had not full believe on the court of justice and was not happy with the remedies that were being offered. This problem came to an end with the enforcement of Judicature Act 1873. Conclusion The existence of common law and equity had a confliction between them as both the law were different from each other. Bothe the system had lot if indifference amongst them which brought them into conflict with each other. With the enactment of the Judicature Act in the year1873, there were many controversies that arose that whether this law has merged the common law and equity or is it an amalgamation of both the laws. It was understood that act of judicature is a one single law that came into existence under a single tribunal which shows that the rules of the two separate court act as one It is very important that those who preach the union of equity and law was unsuccessful to offer more explanations to support their stand and have closed their eyes on the opinion of those who stand on the fusion of only the administration of the systems. [32] Lord Millet mentioned that Judicature Act, had great influence of combing both law and equity in such a way that they both have got merged together to become a single law or single body from two separate body. This fusion has helped greatly as they both have become a single body rather than becoming two different body of law. This has expelled the situation of confusion amongst different court and brought an understanding and harmony between the courts which will help them to work in harmony expelling all kinds of confusion and problems. The Judicature Act is not a fusion of the common law and law of equity. They both exist and their rules still exist. The Judicature act did not change the substantial rule as they are merged to become one so that they can eliminate confusion difference in views and remedies. With the introduction of Judicature Act, it brought a new revolution, as there was not confusion that prevailed and people were happy with the remedies as they were common in nature unlike the Common law and equity law. References: Akpotor, Sunny. "Corruption: The civil society and government."Philosophy and Politics: Discource on Values, Politics, and Power in Africa(2015): 319. Alba, Mariano de. "Drawing the line: addressing allegations of unclean hands in investment arbitration."Braz. J. Int'l L.12 (2015): 322. Alsup, Judge William, Matthew Schruers, and Jonathan Band. "In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit." (2017). Bakshi, P. M. "09_Pleadings: Role and Significance.management" (2016). Brainard, Daniel. "The Remains of Laches in Copyright Infringement Cases: Implications of Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer."J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L.14 (2014): i. Bray, Samuel L. "On Doctrines That Do Many Things."Browser Download This Paper(2015). Carter, J. W., Wayne Courtney, and Gregory Tolhurst. "AN ASSIMILATED APPROACH TO DISCHARGE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT BY DELAY."The Cambridge Law Journal76.1 (2017): 63-86. Dumberry, Patrick, and Gabrielle Dumas-Aubin. "The Doctrine of Clean Hands' and the Inadmissibility of Claims by Investors Breaching International Human Rights Law." (2014). Dumberry, Patrick. "State of Confusion: The Doctrine of Clean Hands in Investment Arbitration after the Yukos Award."The Journal of World Investment Trade17.2 (2016): 229-259. Education, Law, and Trade Magazines. "Lurie v. Wolin Case No. 1-13-0661, 2014 WL 1311977 (Ill. App. 1 Dist., March 31, 2014)."Gaming Law Review and Economics18.5 (2014): 490-493. Feldman, Yuval, and Henry E. Smith. "Behavioural equity."Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE170.1 (2014): 137-159. Ghahramani, Salar. "Professors as Corporate Fiduciaries: Implications for Law, Organizational Ethics, and Public Policy."Va. L. Bus. Rev.10 (2015): 237. Hardy, Stephen. "Towards a Judicature Act, 2015."Amicus Curiae2014.99 (2016): 4-9. Harris, B. E. "Should insurance risk avoidance be reformed and would reform be of a right of equitable rescission or a right sui generis?"Journal of Business Law1 (2013): 23-38. Law, Mark. "He who comes to Equity need not do so with clean hands? illegality and resulting trusts after Patel v Mirza, what should the approach be?"Trusts Trustees(2017). Lemley, Mark. "The Economic Irrationality of the Patent Misuse Doctrine." (2016). Levine, David S. "School Boy's Tricks: Reasonable Cybersecurity and the Panic of Law Creation." (2015). Llamzon, Aloysius. "Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation 1: The State of the Unclean Hands Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as both Omega and Alpha."ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal30.2 (2015): 315-325. Llamzon, Aloysius. "Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation 1: The State of the Unclean Hands Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as both Omega and Alpha."ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal30.2 (2015): 315-325. Mare, Steven. "He Who Comes into Court Must Not Come with Green Hands: The Marijuana Industry's Ongoing Struggle with the Illegality and Unclean Hands Doctrines."Hofstra L. Rev.44 (2015): 1351. Obeng-Odoom, Franklin. "Urban land policies in Ghana: A case of the emperors new clothes?"The Review of Black Political Economy41.2 (2014): 119-143. O'Connell, Anne-Marie. "Justice and the defence of rights in England and Wales: the case of Equity."Miroirs: Revue des civilisations anglophone, ibrique ET ibro-amricaine3/2016 (2016): 50-65. Okoro, Chiedozie. "Thought and Discipline: Orienting Engineering towards and Eco-friendly Philosophy." (2014). Petherbridge, Lee, Jason Rantanen, and R. Polk Wagner. "Unenforceability."Wash. Lee L. Rev.70 (2013): 1751. Rendleman, Doug. "The Triumph of Equity Revisited: The Stages of Equitable Discretion." (2015). Rogan, J., and Athanasian Creed. "This list contains only those sources found particularly helpful. It does not include mention of newspapers, periodicals, novels, or the various official and semi-official law reports. The place of a books publication is given only when not London."The Victorian Church in Decline: Archbishop Tait and the Church of England 1868-1882(2016): 328. Russell, David, and Toby Graham. " Clayton v Clayton in the New Zealand Supreme Court: its hard to keep a good court down."Trusts Trustees22.10 (2016): 1046-1048. Russell, David, and Toby Graham. "G Clayton v Clayton in the New Zealand Supreme Court: its hard to keep a good court down."Trusts Trustees22.10 (2016): 1046-1048. Sherwin, Emily L. "Equity and the Modern Mind."Browser Download This Paper(2016). Smith, Henry E. "Property as Platform: Coordinating Standards for Technological Innovation."Journal of Competition Law and Economics9.4 (2013): 1057-1089. Yasar, Mehmet Fatih, Abdurrahim Emhan, and Pauline Ebere. "Analysis of Organizational Justice, Supervisor Support, and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Energy Sector in Nigeria."Journal of Business Studies Quarterly5.3 (2014): Zhang, Weijun, and Yanbing Li. "Content Review and Copyright Protection in China after the 2009 US v. China WTO Panel Ruling."J. Copyright Soc'y USA62 (2014): 437 [1] Akpotor, Sunny. "Corruption: The civil society and government." psychology and Politics: Discource on Values, Politics, and Power in Africa(2015): 319. [2] Alba, Mariano de. "Drawing the line: addressing allegations of unclean hands in investment arbitration."Braz. J. Int'l L.12 (2015): 322. [3] Alsup, Judge William, Matthew Schruers, and Jonathan Band. "In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit." (2017). [4] Bakshi, P. M. "09_Pleadings: Role and Significance." (2016). [5] Brainard, Daniel. "The Remains of Laches in Copyright Infringement Cases: Implications of Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer."J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L.14 (2014): i. [6] Bray, Samuel L. "On Doctrines That Do Many Things."Browser Download This Paper(2015). [7] Carter, J. W., Wayne Courtney, and Gregory Tolhurst. "AN ASSIMILATED APPROACH TO DISCHARGE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT BY DELAY."The Cambridge Law Journal76.1 (2017): 63-86. [8] Dumberry, Patrick, and Gabrielle Dumas-Aubin. "The Doctrine of Clean Hands' and the Inadmissibility of Claims by Investors Breaching International Human Rights Law." (2014). [9] Dumberry, Patrick. "State of Confusion: The Doctrine of Clean Hands in Investment Arbitration after the Yukos Award."The Journal of World Investment Trde17.2 (2016): 229-259. [10] Education, Law, and Trade Magazines. "Lurie v. Wolin Case No. 1-13-0661, 2014 WL 1311977 (Ill. App. 1 Dist., March 31, 2014)."Gaming Law Review and Economics 18.5 (2014): 490-493. [11] Feldman, Yuval, and Henry E. Smith. "Behavioural equity."Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE170.1 (2014): 137-159. [12] Ghahramani, Salar. "Professors as Corporate Fiduciaries: Implications for Law, Organizational Ethics, and Public Policy."Va. L. Bus. Rev.10 (2015): 237. [13] Hardy, Stephen. "Towards a Judicature Act, 2015."Amicus Curiae2014.99 (2016): 4-9. [14] Harris, B. E. "Should insurance risk avoidance be reformed and would reform be of a right of equitable rescission or a right sui generis?"Journal of Business Law1 (2013): 23-38. [15] Law, Mark. "He who comes to Equity need not do so with clean hands? illegality and resulting trusts after Patel v Mirza, what should the approach be?"Trusts Trustees(2017) [16] Lemley, Mark. "The Economic Irrationality of the Patent Misuse Doctrine." (2016). [17] Levine, David S. "School Boy's Tricks: Reasonable Cybersecurity and the Panic of Law Creation." (2015). [18] Llamzon, Aloysius. "Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation 1: The State of the Unclean Hands Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as both Omega and Alpha."ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal30.2 (2015): 315-325. [19] Llamzon, Aloysius. "Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation 1: The State of the Unclean Hands Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as both Omega and Alpha."ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal30.2 (2015): 315-325. [20] 20 Mare, Steven. "He Who Comes into Court Must Not Come with Green Hands: The Marijuana Industry's Ongoing Struggle with the Illegality and Unclean Hands Doctrines."Hofstra L. Rev.44 (2015): 1351. [21] Obeng-Odoom, Franklin. "Urban land policies in Ghana: A case of the emperors new clothes?"The Review of Black Political Economy41.2 (2014): 119-143. [22] O'Connell, Anne-Marie. "Justice and the defence of rights in England and Wales: the case of Equity."Miroirs: Revue des civilisations anglophone, ibrique ET ibro-amricaine3/2016 (2016): 50-65. [23] 23 Okoro, Chiedozie. "Thought and Discipline: Orienting Engineering towards and Eco-friendly Philosophy." (2014). [24] Petherbridge, Lee, Jason Rantanen, and R. Polk Wagner. "Unenforceability."Wash. Lee L. Rev.70 (2013): 1751. [25] Rendleman, Doug. "The Triumph of Equity Revisited: The Stages of Equitable Discretion." (2015). [26] Rogan, J., and Athanasian Creed. "This list contains only those sources found particularly helpful. It does not include mention of newspapers, periodicals, novels, or the various official and semi-official law reports. The place of a books publication is given only when not London."The Victorian Church in Decline: Archbishop Tait and the Church of England 1868-1882(2016): 328. [27] Russell, David, and Toby Graham. " Clayton v Clayton in the New Zealand Supreme Court: its hard to keep a good court down."Trusts Trustees22.10 (2016): 1046-1048. [28] Russell, David, and Toby Graham. "G Clayton v Clayton in the New Zealand Supreme Court: its hard to keep a good court down."Trusts Trustees22.10 (2016): 1046-1048. [29] Sherwin, Emily L. "Equity and the Modern Mind."Browser Download This Paper(2016). [30] Smith, Henry E. "Property as Platform: Coordinating Standards for Technological Innovation."Journal of Competition Law and Economics9.4 (2013): 1057-1089. Study of Energy Sector in Nigeria."Journal of Business Studies Quarterly5.3 (2014):. [31] Yasar, Mehmet Fatih, Abdurrahim Emhan, and Pauline Ebere. "Analysis of Organizational Justice, Supervisor Support, and Organizational Commitment: A Case [32] Zhang, Weijun, and Yanbing Li. "Content Review and Copyright Protection in China after the 2009 US v. China WTO Panel Ruling."J. Copyright Soc'y USA62 (2014): 437.

Poverty Essays - Oxnard, California, Oxnard College,

Poverty The Poverty Poverty is a global problem, and it has existed from the beginning of civilization. Hunger, homelessness, and lack of health care are major aspects of this world-wide dilemma. Many countries are in complete poverty and the majority are third-world countries. Within the United States of America, a land of valuable, there are also pockets of extreme poverty. Trying to solve this huge problem of poverty. the United States of America, have developed for various reasons, and these situations have led to a great deal of problems. Throughout the world, poverty has plagued all countries. In smaller, under-developed countries many people die from starvation. These countries can not afford to support their citizens. Due to their financial problems, the people lack proper shelter and clothing to keep themselves warm during cold months. Since they lack adequate shelter and clothing, diseases occur all over. These diseases develop a lot easier with poor nutrition. Once again with more financial problems, health care is limited to none. T.L Berry English Professor at Oxnard College says ?poverty is usually caused by the difficulty in holding and even getting a job. Ability, education, and skills help determine the kind of job an individual gets?. That is the matter. Through out our history, people in the United State have valued self reliance, convinced that social standing is mostly a matter of individual talent and effort. This perspective sees society offering plenty of opportunity to anyone able and willing to take advantage of it. The poor are whoever can not or will not work, women and men with fewer skills, less schooling, and little motivation. Everyone does not have the same physical abilities and mental abilities. Poor health and abilities prevent some people from holding a job. Through science people have been able to hold onto jobs a lot easier. It has increased the need for professional workers and lowered the demand for the unskilled . So, the people with higher education will get paid a higher income, and people with lower education will get paid a lower income. The United States of America, the richest country in the world, has its share of poverty granted, American poverty is no match to third world poverty, but for such a prosperous country it is pretty sad. Most third world countries do not have social security or welfare. So people of those countries have no income to keep themselves going. Even though. America does have both social security and welfare, this country still has many homeless and starving people Example at Ventura county, the place of many wealthy residents live in almost million value properties, but Oxnard is the city of poverty with thousand family on welfare and there are a lot of people still line up everyday at EDD to claim unemployment benefits. The poverty in America will not be solved all at once. Simply creating jobs will not help eliminate poverty because there are some people who are disabled and just can not work. The government social welfare programs help to add income to many people. These people could be the retired, unemployed, disabled, or widowed. In order to help the less fortunate, the people that are employed are taxed to raise money to pay for social security and other benefits. For the higher income workers taxes are higher, and for lower income workers taxes are lower. The United States of America is a land of plenty and America is known for its freedom and advantages. With all these possibilities to succeed, America has its own shame. Sadly enough, poverty has struck this country. The city of poverty is found in a wealthy region called Oxnard city. The economic development of Ventura County is extremely uneven. Things that help these small towns are efforts like Oxnard. A variety of things were done to he lp lower the unemployment rate. One important item is the big industry, like automation, computer, that came into the area. The government has been doing a lot to decrease unemployment. They have been creating government jobs for the people, a program which began in the couple years ago. In fact, they set up work training and help people find jobs at EDD center. There are many big

Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl

â€Å"Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl† is the story of a girl born into slavery who’s will and determination never waiver as she fights for her freedom and the freedom of her children. Harriet Jacobs’ story brings to life the reality of slavery; the cruelty, the sexual relationships between master and slave, the psychological abuse, the separation of slave families, the dangers of escape, and the kindness that can be found in the middle of it all. Harriet was fortunate to be born into a position in which she could live with her mother and father and in fact did not even know she was a slave until her mother died. At that time she was sent to live with her mother’s mistress. This was also a fortunate position as her mistress was kind and compassionate and vowed to care for her in thanks for the many loyal years of service her mother had provided. However, her luck would not last as her mistress died and left Harriet to her niece, a five year old girl. This is when Dr. Norcom, the father of her mistress, entered her life and changed it forever. At only 15 years old Dr. Norcom began pursuing and harassing Harriet sexually but her hatred for him and the moral upbringing provided by her grandmother made her continually refuse and evade him. Harriett met another white man who became her lover and had two children with him. Because of the laws of that time her two children immediately became the property of Dr. Norcom as she was. Their father tried to buy her and their children but Dr. Norcom refused. Because of this, Harriett feared for her children and seriously began planning an escape. She ran away and after being hidden a few places by friends of the family she finally was hidden in the tiny crawl space above her grandmother’s house. The space was barely large enough for her body and allowed only limited movement. The space had no insulation or ventilation and so provided unbearable conditions for Harriett... Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl Harriet Jacobs’ memoir, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, shows us the life of a female slave and the abuse she suffered at the hands of her master. This was very different than the abuse we have witnessed from the other slaves we’ve read about. This book was very moving, because it was the real life account of a woman who was sexually abused. It was revolting to read as well, because she made herself believe that the abuse she was suffering was OK, because that was how she served her master. Jacobs uses rhetoric very well to make the reader sickened and saddened at the same time. Jacobs uses rhetoric to gain sympathy for abused, enslaved females in the south by giving accounts of her life in slavery to northern white women. Other authors of books in this time who were slaves probably used rhetoric to target men for the most part. In this era, men were the ones who made a difference in the country. They fought in the wars and were the leaders in a family. Jacobs’s use of rhetoric to affect women in such a personal way as the sexual abuse of a woman must have, and still does, strike a chord in our hearts. It is upsetting to think that she made herself believe that it was her job to have sex with her master. I’m sure this was hard for northern white women to understand and her use of rhetoric is ideal to help them get angry at the slavery system. I am sure many women read this book and knew exactly how she felt and wanted to do something about the what slavery was doing to these women.... Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl Incidents Knowing that most Americans today will never truly know what slavery meant to those slaves who were held in captivation under it during the nation’s past, Harriet Jacobs still manages to paint a disturbing portrait in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl of how it changed her, effectively granting readers a better understanding of the institution. However, her narrative falls short in that she purely focuses on all the bad elements that had taken place in her life, thus reducing what genuinely seems to be an exemplary argument against slavery to - at times - no more than a plea for attention or an enticement for pity, despite her direct addresses to the contrary. Given, Jacobs was a slave, and she makes it expressly clear that it was not an enjoyable experience, but her work gives the impression that either she really had a terrible life, or she’s omitted nicer parts for the sake of shock value. Either way, her argument comes across, loud and clear. One of the more noticeable points of Jacobs’ writing is that she constantly addresses the reader, particularly people from the North and in several cases, women. This entreaty usually comes at the end of every other paragraph, and so the account is made to seem more like an address than a narrative. Dozens of phrases like â€Å"Oh, reader †¦Ã¢â‚¬  or â€Å"If you only knew †¦Ã¢â‚¬  are to be found in the text, and these almost make the story sound too melodramatic for it’s own good, if the goal of the author is to encourage the abolition of slavery. Where Jacobs fails to do much with her overly emphasized diction, however, she comes through with her accounts and stories about her and her life, which speak for themselves as ultimately championing freedom for all humanity. One particular section of the text is more disturbing than the rest though, not for depicting an incident of excessive cruelty, but because of it’s revelations about Jacobs. When the author writes â€Å"Ta... Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl Ashley Hand Slavery: The Moral Corruption of Family â€Å"Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl† is a narrative that describes a young girl’s trials and tribulations while being an involuntary member of the institution of slavery. Jacobs, like every other victim of the atrocity known as slavery, wishes that people in the north would do more to put a stop to this harmful practice. Slavery is an understood dishonor of the past. This is true, not only because of the injustices done to the slaves, but for the negative effects that the slave holders and their wives underwent. When there are basic rights of freedom being denied in a society, no ethical principles can be upheld. The fact that this sinful treatment of other human beings was permitted had a morally crippling effect not only on the principle victim, the slave, but on the entire household in which the slave resided. Slavery corrupted the morals of everyone within its reach. First and foremost, we must recognize that the primary and most directly affected victim due to slavery, is of course, the slave. Ranging from lashings, emotional struggles, and even death, slaves have felt the truest and most severe form of slavery. They are not allowed to own property because â€Å"according to Southern laws, a slave, being property, can hold no property†(6). Harriet Jacobs describes many of her misfortunes and happenings while under the thumb and close watch of Dr. Flint. She was degraded and insulted many times throughout her stay with him. For example, Jacobs recalls â€Å"When he told me that I was made for his use, made to obey his command in every thing; that I was nothing but a slave, whose will must and should surrender to his, never before had my puny arm felt half so strong†(18). This was only the beginning however, and pretty soon thereafter sexual advances were made by Dr. Flint in which he â€Å"peopled my young mind with unclean image s, such as only a vile monster could ... Free Essays on Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl â€Å"Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl† is the story of a girl born into slavery who’s will and determination never waiver as she fights for her freedom and the freedom of her children. Harriet Jacobs’ story brings to life the reality of slavery; the cruelty, the sexual relationships between master and slave, the psychological abuse, the separation of slave families, the dangers of escape, and the kindness that can be found in the middle of it all. Harriet was fortunate to be born into a position in which she could live with her mother and father and in fact did not even know she was a slave until her mother died. At that time she was sent to live with her mother’s mistress. This was also a fortunate position as her mistress was kind and compassionate and vowed to care for her in thanks for the many loyal years of service her mother had provided. However, her luck would not last as her mistress died and left Harriet to her niece, a five year old girl. This is when Dr. Norcom, the father of her mistress, entered her life and changed it forever. At only 15 years old Dr. Norcom began pursuing and harassing Harriet sexually but her hatred for him and the moral upbringing provided by her grandmother made her continually refuse and evade him. Harriett met another white man who became her lover and had two children with him. Because of the laws of that time her two children immediately became the property of Dr. Norcom as she was. Their father tried to buy her and their children but Dr. Norcom refused. Because of this, Harriett feared for her children and seriously began planning an escape. She ran away and after being hidden a few places by friends of the family she finally was hidden in the tiny crawl space above her grandmother’s house. The space was barely large enough for her body and allowed only limited movement. The space had no insulation or ventilation and so provided unbearable conditions for Harriett...

The Lie-Lay Confusion Explained

The Lie-Lay Confusion Explained Lay and lie are two words often interchanged mistakenly in business grammar. Lay means â€Å"to place.† Lie, as a verb, means â€Å"to recline or tell an untruth.† (Lie, as a noun, means a falsehood.) Lie, as a noun is generally clear, but the verb lie and the verb lay can be confusing. Lay (principal parts: lay, laid, laying) means â€Å"to put† or â€Å"to place† and needs an object to complete its meaning: * Please lay the brochures carefully on the desk. * I laid the two other notes there yesterday. * The sales manager is always laying the blame on his staff when sales drop. Lie (principal parts: lie, lay, lain, lying) means â€Å"recline or rest, or stay.† It can refer to either a person or thing as assuming or being in a reclining position. The verb â€Å"lie† cannot take an object: * Now he lies in bed most of the day, sulking about the lost sale. * The opportunities lay before us. * This RFP has lain unanswered for days. * Today’s mail is lying on the receptionist’s desk. Here is an easy tip to check your use of these verbs: substitute the word â€Å"place, placed, or placing (depending on grammar structure.) If the substitute fits, lay is correct. If not, use lie. Remember: Lay = place. To test this: *I will (lie or lay) down now. You would not write, â€Å"I will place down now.† So, this tells you readily that lay is correct in this sentence: â€Å"I will lay down now.† * I (laid or lay) the pad on his desk. â€Å"I placed the pad on his desk† makes sense, so, lay is correct in this sentence: â€Å"I laid the pad on the desk.† (past tense) * These files have (laid or lain) untouched for days. You would not write, â€Å"These files have placed untouched for days† so lie is correct: â€Å"These files have lain untouched.† Correct YourBusiness GrammarChallenges in this webinar.

Plastic Surgery College Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Plastic Surgery College - Essay Example Reconstructive surgery on the other hand can be defined as the surgery which can be pursued by so many people and this is only appropriate to those people who have irregular formations on their bodies. So, it is due to these irregular formations on ones body which has led to the reconstructive surgery by these people in order to try and make their bodies look good and also proportional. An example is the presence of a broken scar or even an earlobe which is so common to so many people. It is due to this fact you will tend to find that people will do plastic surgery on their bodies. So in real essence, plastic surgery is done on people's body in order to try and change their looks. So research was done in most of the teenagers and adults since these are the type of people who are basically doing plastic surgery so that they can be in a position to try and change their bodies' images. It was out of the research which was done on these people which gave the following advantages and disa dvantages. (Lovice, 2000). Plastic surgery can have so many advantages but only when the right procedures have been applied. A good example to explain this is the case of the cosmetic surgery which is one of the plastic surgeries used by so many people. This is because cosmetic surgery can be one of the things one would need in order to enhance ones image. Everyone would love to have a beautiful look and this is what is making so many people to dash for plastic surgery since with plastic surgery, one is in a position to improve on ones image. Plastic surgery has been a solution for so many people to try and change their images. Plastic surgery is seen to have peoples sensitivity, psychology and bodily. This is because in most cases, the representation or even the observation of ones body can be used in many cases to manage ones life obliquely. In this case, am trying to say than plastic surgery can help in improving ones facade and hence can be used as one of the achievement to ones life. You find that during the growth of a person especially those people who are brought up at the rural areas whereby they have to do most of the families activities say looking after the cattle, collecting firewood's, you will find that these people are exposed to so many body arms which will lead to so many scars in their bodies. At times, such scars are not well pleasing to look at and hence it is due to this fact you will find that so many people will do plastic surgery so that they can be in a position to improve on their appearance. So in this case, plastic surgery will have the impact of improving ones body hence leading to ones excel in life. (Lovice, 2000). Plastic surgery has also the advantage of making people to look healthier and energetic. You find that so many people can have the benefits of plastic surgery not only at their early ages but they can have these benefits even at any given age. This is because it is not sensitive to age. Even the old people can use plastic surgery so that they can be in a position to look good and healthy. So in this case, for example those adult people who do plastic surgery, they eventually prepare themselves mentally for the gorgeous and beautiful looks hence can make them look good and healthy. It is due to the development of their looks which can then be seen to make them live more energetically. Patients in this case are also seen to have an emotional powerful improvement while performing plastic surgery. An

Future of Work Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Future of Work - Coursework Example Autonomous workers owned their production means and had complete control over their work. Most of the farm products were consumed by households while surplus was sold in surrounding towns and villages. Farmers completed their tasks using crude tools the fruits of labor were largely reliant on temperature and climate changes. Farmers relied on moneylenders and merchants for financial support for the acquisition of farm inputs as well as land. Many farmers were seasonal employees, which was their mode of financing their agricultural activities. Early fur trade demanded high level of endurance with porters toiling under heavy loads. Fishing, which was also a seasonal activity like fur production, was characterized by highly volatile output leading to fluctuations of market earnings. As such, fishermen were compelled to look for supplementary work in agriculture as well as forestry. With Canada focused on exploiting and exporting natural resources to the mother nation, most people were e ngaged in the production of staples, which entailed laborious work. c) As industrialization took off from mid 19th century in Canada, work lost its intrinsic meaning as it emerged as a way of earning a living. According to Krahn, Hughes & Lowe, (2011), the economy of Canada was still basically agrarian by 1840, which later changed rapidly with industrialization.

How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay Example for Free

How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay Abraham Lincoln was Born on February 12, 1809 in Kentucky. Lincoln Died on April 15, 1865 at the age of 65 Lincoln’s Formal education was limited to 18 months of schooling. Prior to politics Lincoln was a lawyer Lincoln served as an Illinois state legislator, member of the House of Representatives and was an unsuccessful candidate for the Senate. Elected President in 1860; Lincoln served from 1861-1865 as the 16th President of the United States. Lincoln wanted to evoke a Spirit of reconciliation with the states that had seceded! because he didnt want to dissolve the union IN COMPLIANCE with a custom as old as the Government itself, I appear before you to address you brieï ¬â€šy and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States to be taken by the President before he enters on the execution of this office. I do not consider it necessary at present for me to -Timeliness discuss those matters of administration about which there is no special anxiety or excitement. Apprehension seems to exist among the people of -Lincoln Openly Addresses prominent issues of the Southern States that by the accession of a the time. Republican Administration their property and their peace and personal security are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that I have no purpose, directly or -Antithesis indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no -Parallelism lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this and many similar declarations and had never recanted them; and more than this, they placed in the platform for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves and to me, the clear and emphatic resolution which I now read: Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes. I now reiterate these sentiments, and in doing so I only press upon the public attention the most conclusive evidence of which the case is susceptible that the property, peace, and security of no section are to be in any wise endangered by the now incoming Administration. I add, too, that all the protection which, consistently with the Constitution and the laws, can be given will be cheerfully given to all the States when lawfully demanded, for whatever cause—as cheerfully to one section as to another. There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions: No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due. It is scarcely questioned that this provision was intended by those who made it for the reclaiming of what we call fugitive slaves; and the intention of the lawgiver is the law. All members of Congress swear their support to the whole Constitution—to this provision as much as to any other. To the proposition, then, that slaves whose cases come within the terms of this clause shall be delivered up their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they would make the effort in good temper, could they not with nearly equal unanimity frame and pass a law by means of which to keep good that unanimous oath? There is some difference of opinion whether this clause should be enforced by national or by State authority, but surely that difference is not a very material one. If the slave is to be surrendered, it can be of but little consequence to him or to others by which authority it is done. And should anyone in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept? Again: In any law upon this subject ought not all the safeguards of liberty known in civilized and humane jurisprudence to be introduced, so that a free man be not in any case surrendered as a slave? And might it not be well at the same time to provide by law for the enforcement of that clause in the Constitution which guarantees that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States? I take the ofï ¬ cial oath to-day with no mental reservations and with no purpose to construe the Constitution or laws by any hypercritical rules; and while I do not choose now to specify particular acts of Congress as proper to be enforced, I do suggest that it will be much safer for all, both in ofï ¬ cial and private stations, to conform to and abide by all those acts which stand unrepealed than to violate any of them trusting to ï ¬ nd impunity in having them held to be unconstitutional. It is seventy-two years since the ï ¬ rst inauguration of a President under our National Constitution. During that period ï ¬ fteen different and greatly distinguished citizens have in succession administered the executive branch of the Government. They have conducted it through many perils, and generally with great success. Yet, with all this scope of precedent, I now enter upon the same task for the brief constitutional term of four years under great and peculiar difï ¬ culty. A disruption of the Federal Union, heretofore only menaced, is now formidably attempted. Lincoln’s Inaugural had many important points that are critical to understanding the time. Point One: He promoted and promised-Strongest possible federal support for the Fugitive Slave Law and the service/labour clause. There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions: No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due. It is scarcely questioned that this provision was intended by those who made it for the reclaiming of what we call fugitive slaves; and the intention of the lawgiver is the law. All members of Congress swear their support to the whole Constitution—to this provision as much as to any other. To the proposition, then, that slaves whose cases come within the terms of this clause shall be delivered up their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they would make the effort in good temper, could they not with nearly equal unanimity frame and pass a law by means of which to keep good that unanimous oath? There is some difference of opinion whether this clause should be enforced by national or by State authority, but surely that difference is not a very material one. If the slave is to be surrendered, it can be of but little consequence to him or to others by which authority it is done. And should anyone in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept? Again: In any law upon this subject ought not all the safeguards of liberty known in civilized and humane jurisprudence to be introduced, so that a free man be not in any case surrendered as a slave? And might it not be well at the same time to provide by law for the enforcement of that clause in the Constitution which guarantees that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States? Timeliness There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions: No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due. Here Lincoln uses a direct reference to a portion of the constitution under debate. -Timeliness. . Lincoln wanted to see that the Laws of the Union, be abided by all states. Being The President-Elect, Lincoln knew it was his job to uphold the laws. I take the ofï ¬ cial oath to-day with no mental reservations and with no purpose to construe the Constitution or laws by any hypercritical rules; and while I do not choose now to specify particular acts of Congress as proper to be enforced, I do suggest that it will be much safer for all, both in ofï ¬ cial and private stations, to conform to and abide by all those acts which stand unrepealed than to violate any of them trusting to ï ¬ nd impunity in having them held to be unconstitutional. It is seventy-two years since the ï ¬ rst inauguration of a President under our National Constitution. During that period ï ¬ fteen different and greatly distinguished citizens have in succession administered the executive branch of the Government. They have conducted it through many perils, and generally with great success. Yet, with all this scope of precedent, I now enter upon the same task for the brief constitutional term of four years under great and peculiar difï ¬ culty. A disruption of the Federal Union, heretofore only menaced, is now formidably attempted. I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments. It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself. I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments. It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself. Eloquence Timelessness Perpetuity. The Constitution was established to form a more perfect union than the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union had been, which was explicitly perpetual in name and text, and thus the Constitution too was perpetual. He added that even were the Constitution construed as a simple contract, it could not be legally rescinded without an agreement between all parties. Lincoln didn’t recognize the Confederacy and attempted to reunite the Union in his 1st inaugural He looked at the Constitution as a contract and that A group can breach a contract but legally they are still bound to it. Again: If the United States be not a government proper, but an association of States in the nature of contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One party to a contract may violate it—break it, so to speak—but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it? Descending from these general principles, we ï ¬ nd the proposition that in legal contemplation the Union is perpetual conï ¬ rmed by the history of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And ï ¬ nally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was to form a more perfect Union. But if destruction of the Union by one or by a part only of the States be lawfully possible, the Union is less perfect than before the Constitution, having lost the vital element of perpetuity. It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void, and that acts of violence within any State or States against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances. Lincoln during his speech told his audience that there wouldn’t be an invasion of the southern territory unless it were necessary for him to uphold his obligation to hold, occupy and possess the property and places belonging to the Federal government. Therefore consider that in view of the Constitution and the -Timeliness laws the Union is unbroken, and to the extent of my ability, I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in -Civil war was about to begin all the States. Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part, and I shall perform it so far as practicable unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means or in some authoritative manner direct the contrary. I trust this will not be regarded as a menace, but only as the declared purpose of the Union that it will -Subtle Warning constitutionally defend and maintain itself. -Timeliness In doing this there needs to be no bloodshed or violence, and there shall be none unless it be forced upon the national authority. The power confided to me will be used to hold, -Lincoln is Speaking Directly to Secession and occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the approaching Civil War. Government and to collect the duties and imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere. Where hostility to the United States in any interior -Here we See Lincoln’s point that locality shall be so great and universal as to prevent competent resident citizens from holding the Federal offices, there would be no invasion for the there will be no attempt to force obnoxious strangers among the people for that object. While the strict legal right may south unless it were necessary to do exist in the Government to enforce the exercise of these offices, the attempt to do so would be so irritating and so so to uphold the government or to nearly impracticable withal that I deem it better to forego for the time the uses of such offices. defend the union. There would be no invasion of the South unless such were necessary for him as President to fulfill his obligation to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the federal government. The Mail would Continue The mails, unless repelled, will continue to be furnished in all parts of the Union. So far as possible the people everywhere shall have that sense of perfect security which is most favorable to calm thought and reï ¬â€šection. The course here indicated will be followed unless current events and experience shall show a modiï ¬ cation or change to be proper, and in every case and exigency my best discretion will be exercised, according to circumstances actually existing and with a view and a hope of a peaceful solution of the national troubles and the restoration of fraternal sympathies and affections. That there are persons in one section or another who seek to destroy the Union at all events and are glad of any pretext to do it I will neither afï ¬ rm nor -Antithesis deny; but if there be such, I need address no word to them. To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak? Friday, November 7, 2008 23 Before entering upon so grave a matter as the destruction of our national fabric, with all its beneï ¬ ts, its memories, and its hopes, would it not be wise to ascertain precisely why we do it? Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you ï ¬â€šy from have no real existence? Will you, while the certain ills you ï ¬â€šy to are greater than all the real ones you ï ¬â€šy from, will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake? Reconciliation Timely All profess to be content in the Union if all constitutional rights can be maintained. Is it true, then, that any right plainly written in the Constitution has been denied? I think not. Happily, the human mind is so constituted that no party can reach to the audacity of doing this. Think, if you can, of a single instance in which a plainly written provision of the Constitution has ever been denied. If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might in a moral point of view justify revolution; certainly would if such right were a vital one. But such is not our case. All the vital rights of minorities and of individuals are so plainly assured to them by afï ¬ rmations and -Periodic Sentence negations, guaranties and prohibitions, in the Constitution that controversies never arise concerning them. But no organic law can ever be framed with a provision speciï ¬ cally applicable to every question which may occur in practical administration. No foresight can anticipate nor any document of reasonable length contain express provisions for all possible questions. Shall fugitives from labor be surrendered by national or by State authority? The Constitution does not expressly say. May Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories? The -Parallelism Constitution does not expressly say. Must Congress protect slavery in the Territories? The Constitution does not expressly say. From questions of this class spring all our constitutional controversies, and we divide upon them into majorities and minorities. If the minority will not acquiesce, the majority must, or the Government must cease. There is no other alternative, for continuing the Government is acquiescence on one side or the other. If a minority in such case will secede rather than acquiesce, they make a precedent which in turn will divide and ruin them, for a minority of their own will secede from them whenever a majority -Timeless refuses to be controlled by such minority. For instance, why may not Speaks to nation at anytime anyplace. any portion of a new confederacy a year or two hence arbitrarily secede again, precisely as portions of the present Union now claim to About unity. secede from it? All who cherish disunion sentiments are now being educated to the exact temper of doing this. Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new union as to produce harmony only and prevent renewed secession? Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, -Periodic and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Sentence Whoever rejects it does of necessity ï ¬â€šy to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible. The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left. I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be -Parallelism decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government. And while it is obviously possible that such decision may be erroneous in any given case, still the evil effect -Periodic following it, being limited to that particular Sentence case, with the chance that it may be overruled and never become a precedent for other cases, can better be borne than could the evils of a different practice. At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably ï ¬ xed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal. Nor is there in this view any assault upon the court or the judges. It is a duty from which they may not shrink to decide cases properly brought before them, and it is no fault of theirs if others seek to turn their decisions to political purposes. One section of our country believes slavery is right and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong and ought not to be -Antithesis extended. This is the only substantial dispute. The fugitive-slave clause of the Constitution and the law for the suppression of the foreign slave trade are each as well enforced, perhaps, as any law can ever be in a community where the moral sense of the people imperfectly supports the law itself. The great body of the people abide by the dry legal Timely- obligation in both cases, and a few break over in each. This, I think, Slavery-Major debate in country. can not be perfectly cured, and it would be worse in both cases after the separation of the sections than before. The foreign slave trade, now imperfectly suppressed, would be ultimately revived without restriction in one section, while fugitive slaves, now only partially surrendered, would not be surrendered at all by the other. Physically speaking, we can not separate. We can not remove our respective sections from each other nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of Timelessness our country can not do this. They can not but remain face to face, and -Unity intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is -Separate it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before? Can aliens make treaties -relevant-still today easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends? Suppose you go to war, you cannot ï ¬ ght always; and when, after much loss on both sides and no gain on either, you cease ï ¬ ghting, the identical old questions, as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you. This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it. I cannot be ignorant of the fact that many worthy and patriotic citizens are desirous of having the National Constitution amended. While I make no recommendation of amendments, I fully recognize the rightful authority of the people over the whole subject, to be exercised in either of the modes prescribed in the instrument itself; and I should, under existing circumstances, favor rather than oppose a fair opportunity being afforded the people to act upon it. I will venture to add that to me the convention mode seems preferable, in that it allows amendments to originate with the people themselves, instead of only permitting them to take or reject propositions originated by others, not especially chosen for the purpose, and which might not be precisely such as they would wish to either accept or refuse. I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution— which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. To avoid misconstruction of what I have said, I depart from my purpose not to speak of particular amendments so far as to say that, holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable. The Chief Magistrate derives all his authority from the people, and they have referred none upon him to ï ¬ x terms for the separation of the States. The people themselves can do this if also they choose, but the Executive as such has nothing to do with it. His duty is to administer the present Government as it came to his hands and to transmit it unimpaired by him to his successor. Antithesis I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battleï ¬ eld and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our ELOQUENCE- nature. Friday, November 7, 2008 30 Effectiveness -One month Later the Civil War Began. -Awkward, what Lincoln had to say to the audience was irrelevant. -Shortly After his speech many of the southern states seceded. -Rather Tedious and Defensive. -In the Shadow of future speeches, Gettysburg, Lincoln second inaugural. -They didn’t have that much effectiveness for what ensued. Abraham Lincoln Transformation Period 1861-1865. The South wasn’t thrilled with Lincoln’s Election. Lincoln’s election left the south with no other option but secession-out of dislike or fear of Lincoln. Over the next four years the country would experience wars that impacted not only the ideologies of countrymen but President Lincoln as well. Through these events we see how Lincoln’s role as President led to the transformation of a nation and himself as a public ï ¬ gure. Timeline of Events April 12, (4:30A.M.) 1861 Attack on Fort June 1861 Four Slave States Stay in the Sumter. President Lincoln planned to send Union. Despite accepting slavery, Delaware, supplies to Fort Sumter, he alerted the state in Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri didn’t join advance as an attempt to avoid hostile actions. the Confederacy. Although divided in their South Carolina didn’t trust Lincoln; the loyalties, a combination of political commander of the fort, Robert Anderson, was maneuvering and the Union military asked to surrender immediately. Anderson maneuvered these states from secession. offered to surrender, only once his supplies had been exhausted. His offer was met with rejection and The Civil War began when Ft. Sumter was ï ¬ red on. April 1861 Four More States Join the Confederacy. The attack Sumter prompted four more states to join the Confederacy. With Virginias secession, Richmond was named the Confederate capitol. Emancipation Proclamation January 1, 1863 Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln didn’t want to upset bordering slave- holding states so in an attempt to soothe things over, Lincoln resisted the demands of many Republicans for complete abolition. In 1861, Congress had passed an act stating that all slaves employed against the Union were to be considered free. In 1862, another act stated that all slaves of men who supported the Confederacy were to be considered free. Gettysburg July 1-July 3 1863 Gettysburg. Lincoln’s Second Inaugural November 1864 Abraham Lincoln Is Re-Elected. The Republican party nominated President Abraham Lincoln as its presidential candidate, and Andrew Johnson for vice-president. Context The country had been through terrible conditions due to the war. The ground was muddy- wet weather was uncomfortable and it was cold yet thousands upon thousands arrived on capitol grounds in Pennsylvania to hear Lincoln speak in hopes for change and an end to war. Context Continued Times had changed. For the ï ¬ rst time ever, Black Soldier’s were allowed to attend a presidential Inaugural a monumental change in American History. Licoln’s Second Inaugural Fellow-Countrymen: At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential ofï ¬ ce there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the ï ¬ rst. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed ï ¬ tting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public -Periodic declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which Sentences still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chieï ¬â€šy depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured. Past history of the war On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to -Antithesis avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.! -Timeliness Hopes for the Future One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which -Will of the God the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conï ¬â€šict might cease with or even before the conï ¬â€šict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just Gods assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other mens faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh. If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God -Timelessness wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsmans two hundred and ï ¬ fty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.! With malice toward none, with charity for all, with ï ¬ rmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to ï ¬ nish the work we are in, to bind up the nations wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.! Timelessness -Effectiveness

Feminism in Christina Rossettis Goblin Market Essay -- Feminism Femin

Feminism in Christina Rossetti's Goblin Market  Ã‚   The Victorian period marked the first traces of progress in the feminist movement, and poet Christina Rossetti embraced the advancement as her own long-established principles slowly became publicly acceptable. Her poem "Goblin Market" comments on the institutions in Victorian society that she and her feminist contemporaries wished to see altered, creating modern female heroines to carry out its messages. The goblins serve as malicious male figures to tempt the innocent heroines, sisters Laura and Lizzie, to corruption. According to the Victorian definition, a gentleman "never takes unfair advantage . . . or insinuates evil which he dare not say out," and possesses, among other qualities, the ability to avoid all suspicion and resentment (Landow 4). The goblins in Rossetti's poem succeed in contradicting every Victorian definition of a gentleman throughout the poem; the only male figures present, they represent the deleterious nature of men on the lives of women. In "Goblin Market," the mens' only beneficial purpose is "impregnation. Once both sisters have gone to the goblins and acquired the juices of their fruits, they have no further need of them" (Mermin 291). The poem begins with the goblins calling the sisters' attention to their delicious, exotic fruits, which represent the proverbial forbidden fruit--one taste leads to destruction. But the goblins depict their fruits as enticing. Rossetti uses rich imagery such as "Currants and gooseberries,/ Bright-fire-like barberries,/ Figs to fill your mouth,/ Citrons from the South,/ Sweet to tongue and sound to eye" (1) to stimulate the reader's senses, just as the goblins' calls provoke Laura and Lizzie. The goblins at... ...n 'Goblin Market.'" Victorian Poetry. Vol. 21, No. 2. Summer 1983. Phillips, W. Glasgow. "Theme in Christina Rossetti's 'Goblin Market'." The Victorian Web. 1992. URL: http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/hypertext/landow/victorian/vn/victorov.html. Plowman, Melanie. "As A Poet Speaking from Within Female Limitations." The VictorianWeb.1990.URL: http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/hypertext/landow/victorian/vn/victorov.html. Rossetti, Christina. "Goblin Market." Goblin Market and Other Poems. Ed. Candace Ward. New York: Dover Publications, 1994. 1-16. Weathers, Winston. "Christina Rossetti: The Sisterhood of Self." Victorian Poetry. Vol. 111, No. 2, 1965. Wohl, Anthony S. "The Supposed Excessive Sexuality of Lower Classes and Tribal Cultures." The Victorian Web. URL: http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/hypertext/landow/victorian/vn/victorov.html.